Not too much to say about this, since I was only just testing a couple of things out.
As a matter of fact, I'm thinking that i probably should have called the post Juuust testing, because that's all it's really about.
Testing what?
Well, the look of different colours with the white resist, for one thing. And the other thing?
That'd be the scanner.
This very quick, slightly crooked, and haphazardly-edited shot is not from the scanner. My scanner, as with many scanners, decidedly does not like watercolour wash. It's serviceable for pen or pencil stuff (although the difference is pretty obvious when I scan things here as opposed to with the higher quality scanner at work), but it's hopeless at anything involving a wash. Watercolour, ink, soluble graphite... a person may as well not even bother. I'm sure that a lot of you know the same tune, there. Just to compare, above is an admittedly slightly dull shot from my autofocus camera. Nothing to write home about, but you can still see the entire flower. Whereas:
Yeah. Scanner. And that's even after I did my best with what limited editing software I have to make something show up.
Ah well, what can you do?
And considering that I don't even own a computer, it's nice that I have access to a scanner at all, really.
I own the scanner, in fact. Don't own a computer, but I do have a scanner. That sounds odd when I type it out...
Ah well. Again. Thus endeth the pointless post.
Wait a minute. Aren't pointless posts supposed to go to my other blog?
Ah well.
Again.
1 comment:
Is testing really pointless? I like that you're trying new things out. Sometimes we can find wonderful things in those kinds of explorations!
Post a Comment